why does the kjv have extra verses why does the kjv have extra verses

This comes out to a total of 766,137 words, or 25,191 words shorter than the number provided by Scott. and a number of later mss. It gets better. The KJV tells the reader to keep saying the Word, it "Shall not depart) whereas the NLT infers that the Word can simply be studied, read and does not imply to read it out loud. How many chapters did he put in Joel and how many in Malachi? It was omitted from editions of the Greek New Testament at least as far back as 1729, in Daniel Mace's edition. Bible editions of the American Bible Union. As for the BHS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblia_Hebraica_Stuttgartensia "The Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, abbreviated as BHS or rarely BH4, is an edition of the Masoretic Text of the Hebrew Bible as preserved in the Leningrad Codex, and supplemented by masoretic and text-critical notes. Mark 11:26. So looking onwards, to Joel and Malachi, to see which is 3 and which is 4. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. [113] Verse 9 in Greek does not mention Jesus by name or title, but only says "Having arisen he appeared " (the KJV's inclusion of the name Jesus was an editorial emendation as indicated by the use of italic typeface) and, in fact, Jesus is not expressly named until verses 19 and 20 ("the Lord" in both verses); a lengthy use of a pronoun without identification. (2 Samuel 12:20) Then David arose from the earth, and washed, and anointed himself, and changed his apparel, and came into the house of the LORD, and worshipped: then he came to his own house; and when he required, they set bread before him, and he did eat. The KJV for Isaiah 9:2 is: The people that walked in darkness have seen a great light: they that dwell in the land of the shadow of death, upon them hath the light shined. Brill); David Alan Black & Jacob N. Cerone, eds., The Pericope of the Adulteress in Contemporary Research (2016, London & NY, Bloomsbury T&T Clark); John David Punch, The Pericope Adulterae: Theories of Insertion & Omission (2012, Saarbruken, Lap Lambert Academic Publ'g. [60] Expressions of doubt also appeared in the edition of Stephen Courcelles (tienne de Courcelles), in 1658, and from Johann Jakob Griesbach's edition of 1775. ); An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture by Sir Isaac Newton (published posthumously 1785); Letters to Mr. Archdeacon [George] Travis in answer to his Defence of the Three Heavenly Witnesses by Richard Porson (1790, London); A New Plea for the Authenticity of the Text of the Three Heavenly Witnesses or Porson's Letters to Travis Eclectically Examined by Rev. This verse is lacking altogether in ,B,D,L,Z,, 1, Ethiopic, Armenian, several Italic, and Syrian and Coptic mss, and the writings of several early Church Fathers. But I did take the word from some reputable scholars on that score. [89] So it would appear, initially, that the evidence was nearly in equipoise. 1583 and 1594 show that the translators of 1611 simply adopted a rendering that had already obtained currency. Although this may be true, the OED adds quickly that The phrase, however, was early misapprehended (perh. KJV: 7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the holy Ghost, and these three are one.8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, Modern versions: (omitted from main text and not in a footnote). "[22] Without the words at issue the context simply states that a swimming or bathing pool in or near Jerusalem was a gathering place for sick and crippled people, some of whom sought to get into the pool (either for physical comfort or for ritual cleansing) and it was there that Jesus performed miraculous healing. So, the BHS is the most accurate transcription made of the Leningrad Codex. "[52] The UBS gives this omission a confidence rating of A. "from evil" (KJV) versus "from the evil one" (NIV). Here is how Wallace et al attempt to justify their deception You see, the King James Bible you buy off the shelf today is printed in the ROMAN TYPE FACE! Three other points can be made here. The writers of the KJV changed words to suit the translation at the time. . There you have it, friends. The resulting text looks like this (from the Revised Version): RV: 6 Who moreover assayed to profane the temple; on whom we also laid hold;8 from whom thou wilt be able, by examining him thyself, to take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him. Westcott and Hort summarized the evidence as follows: However, one minuscule (ms. 225) placed the pericope after John 7:36. Wherever the Shorter Ending appears, even when combined with the Longer Ending, there is some separation in the text (decoration or a copyist's notation) immediately after verse 8; the only exception being Codex , which treats the Shorter Ending as the proper continuation after verse 8 but then inserts a copyist's note before providing the Longer Ending. I will update the question again accordingly to take this into account, as we now have a source for the KJV's chapter divisions. "), most other Church Fathers don't quote from this ending. Does a summoned creature play immediately after being summoned by a ready action? It is NIV (not NLV); and all modern Bible versions contain those differences with the KJV. http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt1401.htm, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leningrad_Codex, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblia_Hebraica_Stuttgartensia, http://catholic-resources.org/Bible/OT-Statistics-Compared.htm, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Bomberg, We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. Caspar Ren Gregory, who compiled a catalog of New Testament manuscripts, summarizes the situation: "Now I have no doubt that the story [of the adulteress] itself is as old as the Gospel of John or even older, and that it is a true story. All rights reserved. can I bring him back again? And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from the evil one. and Codex Athous Laurae ("") (8th or 9th century); in the first three it is preceded with a copyist's note about being found in only some manuscripts, in it follows verse 8 without such a note, and in all four the Shorter Ending is followed by the Longer Ending. why does the kjv have extra verses . Though there are hundreds of versions and translations of the Bible, the KJV is the most popular. Meaning that the . Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Posted by . It does, however, appear in some significant manuscripts, including 1,13, A, two very old Latin manuscripts, and some Syriac and Boharic manuscripts, and with slight differences in minuscule 33 (9th century). [citation needed], KJV: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. For example, verse 9 says Jesus appeared to Mary Magdalene on "the first day of the week", yet verse 2 said that same day Mary Magdalene did not see Jesus. I watched the film on YouTube with great interest. Christianity Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for committed Christians, experts in Christianity and those interested in learning more. Do roots of these polynomials approach the negative of the Euler-Mascheroni constant? (Malachi 1:12) No tetragrammaton, but capitalised LORD in KJV. Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. It does seem strange that all the other chapters have the same number, apart from Joel and Malachi which have the number of chapters in each, reversed! Verse 4 ("For an angel ") appears but without the concluding words of verse 3 ('waiting for the stirring of the water ") in A (where it says the angel "bathed in the water" rather than "descended into the water"), L, 18 (fourteenth century), and an Egyptian manuscript. 2. Each group individually and collectively analysed every available manuscript (of which there are currently about 5,200 separate documents in the world) and created what is accepted as the most comprehensive Biblical document available. It is found in some other sources, not quite so ancient, such as D,K,W,X, and the Latin Vulgate. [134], By its own context, this paragraph appears misplaced; in the verse preceding this pericope (namely verse 7:52) Jesus is conversing or arguing with a group of men, and in the verse following this pericope (verse 8:12) he is speaking "again unto them", even though verses 8:910 would indicate he was alone in the Temple courtyard and also that a day has passed. They are powerful. Bible translation differences. And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. Did Protestants get "Thine is the Kingdom etc" from the Didache? It only takes a minute to sign up. However, as the years past, the KJV (also known as the Authorized Version) was in serious need of an update. I just want to know why? Why is Matthew 6:13 different in the NIV that some other translations? why is professional identity important in nursing. Matthew 17:21: "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting. which means "Of the Presbyter Ariston." Luke 6:38 - Give, and it shall be given unto you . If you look at the word lips. This verse is missing from Tyndale's version (1534) and the Geneva Bible (1557). Is there a single-word adjective for "having exceptionally strong moral principles"? By clicking Accept all cookies, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy. In addition to this, there is the fact that Greek Orthodox Churches (especially) have a more fluid (less formal or legalistic) notion of how the idea of a "canonical book" should be applied. What are the Apocrypha / Deuterocanonical books. Target Audience. However, children may find it extremely difficult to read. Why is the Lord's Prayer different in the NIV and KJV? The problem with this is that we are led to believe that those 421 changes represent a specific percentage of the wholeor, in Scotts words, five one-hundredths of one percent. That would only be true if there were 791,328 different words (as opposed to total words) in the KJV. It was a gift handed to Queen Elizabeth on her coronation and described as such. The most famous blunder in the history of the King James Bible to come off the printing press was the 1631 edition. Why does the KJV use (singular) "cometh" as the verb for (plural) "distress and anguish" in Proverbs 1:27? The apocrypha is a selection of books which were published in the original 1611 King James Bible. (2 Samuel 12:26) And Joab fought against Rabbah of the children of Ammon, and took the royal city. Identify those arcade games from a 1983 Brazilian music video, Using indicator constraint with two variables. (all in bold type omitted in modern versions). The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? He will not suffer thy foot to be moved: he that keepeth thee will not slumber. Reason: The passage in question is omitted from virtually all modern versions (including both Majority Text editions), frequently without even a footnote. The Revised Version (1881) omitted the italicized words from its main text, making the passage read: " a multitude of them that were sick, blind, halt, withered. In fact, there is a denominational distinction as well: the standard Catholic version of the Lord's Prayer does not include it, but most Protestants do put it in. [69] Moffatt characterized this verse as "an explanatory and harmonistic gloss. It is nowadays widely accepted that these are the last remaining verses written by St. The KJV is just one of the many other versions of the Holy Bible. Though there are hundreds of versions and translations of the Bible, the KJV is the most popular. Innovations in use of Chapter and Verse Numbers WEB explains with a footnote in Romans 16: Textus Receptus places Romans 14:2426 at the end of Romans instead of at the end of chapter 14, and numbers these verses 16:2527, In some translations, verse 13 is combined with verse 12, leaving verse 14 renumbered as verse 13.[149]. In the absence of any immediate grammatical clue, it's a matter of judgement which reading to choose. ", Acts 15:34: "Notwithstanding it pleased Silas to abide there still. Thus verse 15 does not exist in the KJV. The twelve verses shown in the KJV, called the "longer ending" of Mark, usually are retained[84] in modern versions, although sometimes separated from verse 8 by an extra space, or enclosed in brackets, or relegated to a footnote, and accompanied by a note to the effect that this ending is not found in the very oldest Greek mss but it is found in sources almost as old. (1539) and so in some sense was an addition that earlier English Bibles did not have. [144] The evidence that the pericope, although a much-beloved story, does not belong in the place assigned it by many late manuscripts, and, further, that it might not be part of the original text of any of the Gospels, caused the Revised Version (1881) to enclose it within brackets, in its familiar place after John 7:52, with the sidenote, "Most of the ancient authorities omit John 7:538:11. Whilst the kingdom of God resides inside each and every Christian, Gods power is released from spoken prayer. Amen. It is apologetically significant in dealing with two groups: anti-Catholics who deny the existence of vernacular translations before the King James Version (KJV) and certain Catholic Traditionalists who insist on using only the Douay. The NAB, like Bomberg, has 4 in Joel. Is the King James Version the only Bible we should use? Even before the KJV, it was omitted in the Wycliffe and Douay-Rheims versions. Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof. Mark 9:44 Then a space of two lines is left, after which, in the same uncial hand, only in red, is written "Ariston Eritzou." Yet other ancient sources include this longer ending but mark it with asterisks or other signs or notations indicating the copyists had doubts about its authenticity, most notably 1 and several minuscules (all twelfth century or later), according to the UBS notes and Bruce Metzger. About this app. [24], The italicized words do not appear at all in p66, 75, , A(original hand), B, C(original hand), L, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Latin Vulgate manuscripts, and in quotations of the story by several early Greek Fathers. Numbers 6:24-26 grace peace light. In Eastern-rite usage, the doxology is recited in the liturgy after the Lord's Prayer; this is probably how the phrase crept into Eastern Greek mediaeval manuscripts of the New Testament. vegan) just to try it, does this inconvenience the caterers and staff? 56And they went to another village. 6. And it seems the difference is in Bible versions. It can be used without internet access. While Mark has no proper ending, these verses have no proper beginning. Entirely omitted words: it is hard for thee to kick against the pricks. But in the underlying Greek text, the numbers are significantly smaller: there are approximately 5000 changes between the Textus Receptus (the Greek text used by the KJV translators) and the modern critical texts (used as the base for modern translations). Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. As the adage goes, Those who live in glass houses shouldnt throw stones.. KJV: 3 . Although many lists of missing verses specifically name the NIV as the version that had omitted them, these same verses are missing from the main text (and mostly relegated to footnotes) by the Revised Version of 1881 (RV), the American Standard Version of 1901, the Revised Standard Version of 1947 (RSV),[1] the Today's English Version (the Good News Bible) of 1966, and several others. They are lacking in the "earliest and best witnesses", and several ancient Greek mss that do contain them enclose them with markings indicating doubts about their authenticity, the passage contains words or expressions that appear nowhere else in John (such as the Greek words for "at a certain season [= occasionally]" and "stirring" and "diseases"), and the mss that contain this verse differ among themselves as to the wording. [118] The stylistic differences suggest that none of these was written by the author of the Gospel of St. Mark. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? peter macari age. why does the kjv have extra verses. 4. Does not this affect fundamental doctrine? ", Mark 9:44: "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. Pontificae Commissionis de re Biblica Edita. There is power in the Word and we need to keep that in mind when reading and studying the Word of God. [verse 8] For at those words, in almost all copies of the Gospel According to Mark, comes the end. Styling contours by colour and by line thickness in QGIS, Surly Straggler vs. other types of steel frames. [Note: Different editions of the KJV show various treatments of the punctuation, especially at the end of the verses, and of capitalization, especially at the beginning of the verses. To be sure, many of these are fairly significant. Meditate on it day and night so you will be sure to obey everything written in it. Currently many Christians use the New International Version (NIV), New living Translation (NLT) and many more. At about the same time someone else made in other manuscripts the addition of verses 16:24 and 16:2527. in quot. [5] And a certain man was there ", and as a side-note, "Many ancient authorities insert, wholly or in part," and here present the italicized words exactly as they appeared in the KJV. Reason: These words are not found in the oldest sources p74,, A, B, P, several minuscules, some mss of the Italic, Vulgate, Coptic, and Georgian versions. Here is a whole series of lecture on Bible translations by Dan Wallace, that answers this. On the other hand, these 12 verses occur in slightly less ancient Greek mss, A,C,D,K,,13, and a "vast number" of others,[14] and a great many mss of the ancient versions, and is quoted by some other Church Fathers, the earliest being Irenaeus, in the late second century (although his quotations are imprecise). Is there a solution to add special characters from software and how to do it, The difference between the phonemes /p/ and /b/ in Japanese. At some point, two other people, dissatisfied with the abrupt ending at verse 8, and writing independently of each other, supplied the Longer and the Shorter endings. (It is in fact for the reason of accessibility that the Bible must be translated afresh every fifty years or so.). The word is a sort of conjunction and rarely occurs at the end of a sentence. (2 Samuel 12:28) Now therefore gather the rest of the people together, and encamp against the city, and take it: lest I take the city, and it be called after my name. Among major Textus Receptus editions, this verse does not appear in the editions of Erasmus (15161535), Aldus (1518), Colinaeus (1534), Stephanus 1st 3rd eds (15461550), but it did appear in the Complutensian (1514), and in the margins of Stephanus 4th ed (1551), and all of Elzivir's and Beza's eds (15651604). (Therefore the source of the WLC is the BHS). Where total chapters in each book are identical apart from that the number of chapters in joel and malachi are reversed! 3 Actually, the ratios are even tighter: the leaf from the 1611 KJV that I looked at begins with changed in 12:20. This seemingly trivial innovation immediately caught on and can be seen in many bibles of his era, and is still in use today Lists of "missing" verses and phrases go back to the Revised Version[2] and to the Revised Standard Version,[3][4] without waiting for the appearance of the NIV (1973). The question now arises, how then can Daniel Wallace and other enemies of Gods Word make a statement like the one he made above? Why does the Lord's Prayer The "Apocrypha" remained in the King James Bible through the 1626, 1629, 1630, and the 1633 editions. The King James Version is in the public domain. He will still forgive you. My help cometh from the Lord, which made heaven and earth. The UBS edition gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A. KJV: And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, "And he was numbered with the transgressors. 2. [115] Yet, out of that small number, 16 words do not appear elsewhere in the Gospel of Mark, 5 words are used here in a different way than used elsewhere in Mark, and 4 phrases do not appear elsewhere in Mark. The Nestle-Aland and UBS Greek editions enclose it in double brackets. Some simply cut out sections of the Bible altogether or add ideas that were never in the original manuscripts. It appears in K (Codex Cyprius) of the 9th century, and codex 579, of the 13th century, and a very few other places. There you have it. How can we prove that the supernatural or paranormal doesn't exist. So, the newer translations remove these verses or place them in footnotes or in brackets because the translators believe they do not truly belong in the Bible. Deceit is the only thing modern critics can traffic in, for the facts are so overwhelmingly against them that they have no other means by which to denigrate the Word of God. Changes in TYPE FACE are the changes that Wallace et al are referring to. 5 Even at 1 John 5:7-8 (the testimony about the Trinity in the KJV, known as the Comma Johanneum), in which Erasmus added the trinitarian formula in his third edition (1522) only because a Greek MS was made to order in 1520, virtually forcing Erasmus hand, the Dutch scholar did not copy out the Greek MS exactly. I understand the BHS has chapter divisions. The deviation from that would then have been when the christian chapters were placed in the hebrew text.. http://charlesasullivan.com/2693/a-history-of-chapters-and-verses-in-the-hebrew-bible/#comment-5436, "The Christian division into chapters, invented by Archbishop Stephen Langton about the beginning of the thirteenth century, has gained an entrance into the Hebrew Bible. That includes the King James Version from which their version was adapted in the first place! Reasons: The earliest resources including p47, , A,C, several minuscules, several Italic mss, the Vulgate, the Armenian and Ethiopic versions, and quotation in some early Church Fathers support "he stood" (or "it stood"). [citation needed], KJV: 55"But he turned, and rebuked them, and said, Ye know not what manner of spirit ye are of.56For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to save them. This inconsistency has been considered significant by some.[124]. [10] Bomberg not only added the chapter numbers; he was the first to indicate verse numbers on the printed page. Now lets do the math By omitting changes of this nature, we now have about 150 (to be conservative) remaining changes. Indeed, the words of the Holy Ghost are very appropriate here - The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Psalm 12:6. And why was it changed? Friends, this is the ENTIRE extent of the nature of the changes from the King James Bible of 1611 to the King James Bible of the present day. Does a summoned creature play immediately after being summoned by a ready action? This averages out to one change per 8.83 words. KJV: Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting. Henry Alford wrote, "The spuriousness of this controverted passage can hardly be questioned. This, indeed, is one reason why the vast bulk of biblical scholars reject the KJV as the best translation available today and why they reject its underlying Greek text as being identical with the original: errors in the transmissional process have always taken place, and a great number of them are self-evident in the KJV tradition. Only 421 changes to the KJV equals an average of one change per 1880 words. In particular, spelling standardization is the largest single group of changes made between 1611 and the modern era. ), Codex Regius ("L") (8th cent.) You can easily view multiple chapters of the Bible at the same time. As Conybeare described it:[98] "Now in this codex the Gospel of Mark is copied out as far as [i.e., the end of 16:8]. I used to think that the whole God/Satan thing was dreamt up by some good story-teller that, should he have been eligible for royalties would be the richest man in existence! Did any DOS compatibility layers exist for any UNIX-like systems before DOS started to become outmoded? A belief apparently not shared by anyone else: "No one maintains that this rather florid passage belongs to the original Mark not ever to the original form of the long ending of the Textus Receptus." [57] Martin Luther rejected this verse as a forgery and excluded it from his German translation of the Bible while he lived it was inserted into the text by other hands after his death. Why does the NIV have 16 missing verses from the Bible? The entire italicized passage appears in C(third hand), K (also with the angel "bathed in the water"), ,,, and numerous other manuscripts, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian manuscripts, and several Latin Fathers, Some manuscripts S,,, and a few others contain the words enclosed by marks of doubt. [105] Even into the 17th century, some Armenian copyists were omitting the Longer Ending or including it with a note doubting its genuineness.[106]. But none of them affects any major doctrine and most of them arelike the internal changes within the KJV traditionspelling changes. 1609), the verb being supposed to mean to make violent effort., Daniel B. Wallace has taught Greek and New Testament courses on a graduate school level since 1979.